top of page

Quick Read: 'Greenwashing'...and how to avoid it:

Andy Eames

Many of us who travel regularly have witnessed the effects of climate change, biodiversity loss and environmental degradation first-hand. The world remains on course for atmospheric warming of at least 2°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100 – and incidents of wildfires, flooding, rising sea levels and coral bleaching are becoming devastatingly widespread and frequent in many regions. Deforestation and pollution are also damaging vital ecosystems and wildlife. No wonder, then, that many of us are choosing to live and travel in a more responsible way.



A recent survey conducted by Wanderlust magazine revealed that more than 72% of their readers consider sustainable travel to be important in holiday decision-making, with more than 40% assessing the sustainability credentials of hotels and transport providers before booking. Many tourism businesses are implementing measures to reduce the negative impacts of their products and services. Yet some businesses jump on the sustainability bandwagon to look good, rather than to reduce any damaging impacts.


What is greenwashing?

Some companies splash generalised buzzwords – ‘green’, ‘sustainable’, ‘eco-friendly’ – across marketing materials without really tackling the negative impacts of their businesses. This is ‘greenwashing’, a term coined in the 1980s by ecologist Jay Westerveld. “Genuine sustainability must go beyond trending terminology and catchphrases,” says Rachel Nxele, director of sustainability at Sabi Sabi Game Reserve, South Africa. “Hotels and resorts, for example, are crucial players in the tourism industry, but operations can have a significant environmental impact. Practices should make a positive difference.”

One common example of greenwashing is a claim by tourism companies to be ‘carbon neutral’ because they ‘offset’ carbon emissions through tree-planting or community projects – while making little or no attempt to measure or reduce emissions.

Some airlines encourage customers to buy offsetting credits – ostensibly a positive move, yet shifting responsibility for a negative impact of air travel onto customers.

“Tour operators [and other businesses] must look beyond ‘offsetting’ as measurements of impact,” suggests Sam Bruce, co-founder of Much Better Adventures. “Additionally, to ensure communities benefit from tourism, operators should foster strong links with local suppliers, and emphasise the role of communities as equal stakeholders in operations.”

Some airlines shift the responsibility of the negative impact of air travel onto customers.

Other tactics will be familiar to many travellers. Some hotels that offer to wash bed linen less frequently ‘to save energy’ may be primarily interested in saving costs rather than reducing environmental impacts. And some resorts that claim to support local communities simply shuffle in such groups to perform cultural shows, while discouraging guests from spending money outside the hotel. An ‘eco-resort and spa’ in a region with a limited supply of water, perhaps where farmers don’t have enough to irrigate crops, is another example of greenwashing.

“Companies often wax lyrical about recycling or banning single-use plastics,” adds former expedition cruise guide and sustainability expert Victoria Stokes. “However, highlighting small initiatives while neglecting larger issues, such as fossil fuel consumption, suggests greenwashing.”

New expedition ships, increasingly fuelled by methane-based liquefied natural gas, are portrayed as being ‘more sustainable’ because they emit less CO2 and nitrogen oxides than conventionally powered vessels. However, their methane emissions, which can contribute significantly to global warming, are rarely mentioned. Similarly, the exploitation of local ecosystems through unethical practices and overtourism, under the guise of ‘wildlife experiences’, is not as uncommon as you may think.

The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has introduced greenwashing guidelines to help businesses avoid featuring such misinformation in their communications. Recently, the ASA ruled that an airline advert suggesting its use of sustainable aviation fuels – made from used cooking oil and animal fats, and which produce similar amounts of CO2 to traditional jet fuel when burned – contributed to ‘protecting [the world’s] future’ was misleading.

As more travellers turn towards sustainable travel, many see through misleading marketing spiel. “Thorough research will help you choose companies that prioritise real sustainability,” reminds Victoria. “Read between the lines, ask questions and interrogate before you book.”


Try asking these questions before booking…


Hotels

1. What measures have you put in place to conserve energy and water, and how do you manage waste?

2. Are you involved in initiatives that support local biodiversity?

3. Do you partner with local communities? If so, how?


Tour operators

4. Have you committed to the Glasgow Declaration on Climate Action in Tourism goal of halving emissions by 2030 and achieving Net Zero by 2050?

5. How are you reducing the carbon footprints of your itineraries?

6. What proportion of the cost of each trip goes to locally owned and independent businesses?


Cruise companies

7. How do you plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

8. Have you committed to halve emissions by 2030 and hit Net Zero by 2050?


As we have said before at the Sustainable Travel Co., there is no one way to improve the planet and look after it's myriad ecosystems, but if each of us ask a few more questions, do a little more research, and respectfully challenge some long held norms and beliefs, together we can make a difference.


article credit: wanderlust magazine;what is greenwashing

photo credit: shutterstock




11 views0 comments

Comentarios


bottom of page